Finding foreign importers
The importers in the country you're after, read one by one on their own websites, with a first message written for each. The sending stays with you. The method, for a client: 389 names collected, the right 10 in an hour.
We put Italian excellence in front of buyers worldwide
We find the importers who buy a product like yours, country by country.
And we build the AI agents that read orders, prepare the documents and reply in the customer's language.
389 names, the right 10, in one hour · for a client
What they actually do, timed. Open a row to see what it was measured on.
Measured on Itria test systems, except where real traffic or a client delivery is stated. Where a row shows an estimate rather than a measurement, it says so. Items on the bill that don't have a number of our own yet stay off this page until they do.
A hundred real enquiries: orders, reorders, complaints, customs questions, reminders. Four channels, five languages.
A hundred real enquiries across four channels and five languages: this is the time from arrival to a draft ready for approval, as a median over the hundred. Twenty that arrived in the same second were all closed, every one of them, in twenty-one seconds, which is exactly when a person would have to choose which one to ignore. A hundred in, a hundred out with their replies, and the right priority assigned a hundred times out of a hundred: complaints and customs at the top, payments and junk at the bottom.
By hand, the same enquiry takes four to ten minutes, and that's a stated estimate: read, understand, look up the data, write, reread. The seconds are timed; the minutes aren't.
Thirty real business documents: invoices, delivery notes, spec sheets, orders. Five languages, three different layouts.
Two hundred and thirty-four fields right out of two hundred and thirty-seven, and the document type recognised thirty times out of thirty: invoice, delivery note, spec sheet or order, in five languages and three different layouts. We had deliberately hidden an unreadable one in the pile, and it set it aside rather than making up the numbers.
The three missed fields have a reason, and here it is: twice the same issue, a zero amount left blank instead of written as zero, and once a country that wasn't on the document and had to be inferred. None of the three is an invented value.
Open the PDF, find the fields, key them into the business software, double-check.
Six point three seconds per document, median across thirty. By hand, the same document takes three to eight minutes, and that's a stated estimate: the seconds are timed, the minutes aren't.
30 documents · 4 September 2026A contact writing on WhatsApp, read and queued with the next step already assigned.
Median across nineteen real contacts, not simulated ones. No one is left without a next step, and that's the point: leads don't go cold on their own, they go cold when nobody touches them.
19 contacts · real traffic, August 2026The founder of a management SaaS for the beauty industry was looking for Italian professionals to collaborate with, within a specific follower range. Five professions, six cities, no bought lists.
Twenty-two searches, three hundred and eighty-nine names collected, ten delivered in priority order: 2.6%. In between, two filters, the thresholds he set himself, and a profile-by-profile read of the thirty left. One hour and four minutes from the first search to delivery. By hand, the same job takes a week, and somewhere around the two-hundredth name you stop reading and start scrolling.
Three of the ten had already put the problem in writing, in public: one had asked customers to message him again because he'd lost some of their messages, and two take bookings by hand. For those three, the first message was already written, built on what they had posted.
Five public exhibitor lists. No contacts bought, no paid lists.
Twenty minutes in total, for work that takes a salesperson a whole day. Four hundred and twenty-eight names read, sixty-four websites found and confirmed one by one, and ten emails written, each built on a flaw verified on that company's own website: none of the ten could have gone to anyone else.
Run on 4 September 2026 · 428 namesA maker of tube-bending machines, a restaurant, a domain for sale, a Chinese gaming page.
Nineteen companies had the right name and someone else's website. They were caught before they got onto the list, not after the email had gone out: the step that caught them checks each website against its content, and it's the most valuable step in the whole chain.
Run on 4 September 2026 · out of 428 namesAn external check asks the machine whether the systems are up, every five minutes, day and night.
An external check has asked the machine whether the systems are up every five minutes, day and night, for a hundred and twenty-four days: roughly thirty-five thousand seven hundred checks. It runs from outside, so it doesn't depend on the machine it's watching.
Underneath, every single process is logged: when it started, what it worked on, how it ended. Three hundred and fifty-six log entries between 18 May and 26 August. No engine runs in the dark, and when something breaks, a person responds.
Within an hour I received a PDF with all the information.Client delivery · 11 September 2026
Francescofounder of GenFuture, a management platform for the beauty industry
The ask was feedback on a landing page. The answer was a read of the whole project: 14 pages, delivered 3 months before launch.
44 sources, every one linked, plus the Italian research group that studies exactly these tools.
Fifteen minutes to find out which item is costing you most →
The importers in the country you're after, read one by one on their own websites, with a first message written for each. The sending stays with you. The method, for a client: 389 names collected, the right 10 in an hour.
Orders read by the system, packing lists and export invoices filled in, replies to importers drafted in their language. A person approves. On thirty test documents, 98.7% of fields captured correctly.
The 2026 SME digitalisation voucher covers 50% to 65% of a project, up to 25,000 euros, and names AI explicitly. Exporters can also apply for the SIMEST grant. In Piedmont, applications open on 22 October.
Each one does a single job, on top of the tools you already use, and we start with the job that costs you most. Where there's a measurement you'll find it alongside, with its label: bench means a test system, then there's real traffic and work done for a client.
All seventeen pages, area by area, with what each one does and how it's measured: AI agents for business, with their measurements →
| When | What happens | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| 15 minutes | We look at how you work and list the steps where you're losing out. | The costliest item, and what it costs you. |
| Day 1 | We agree on the number we'll measure by, and take a reading before touching anything. | The baseline, in writing. |
| Days 2 to 30 | We build a single process: the one we chose, not four at once. | A working system, credentials included. |
| Day 30 | We measure the same number again and put it in front of you. | Before and after. No renewal, no penalty. |
How this differs from a web agency or a consultancy, point by point, and the four things we never do: it's all in the method →
A system that works for you needs someone keeping an eye on it while you sleep. Monitoring is automatic, 24/7; the response is human. No exceptions.
We use a different technology, or nothing at all. We don't sell AI, we sell results: put AI where it isn't needed and the bill won't go down, and on day thirty the number will show it.
Every tool, supplier and limit is listed, and any of them can be changed. AI transparency →
Systems that carry out a specific task in place of a person, inside the company's own tools: they read an order and fill in the packing list, draft the reply to an importer, send the payment reminder. They can act, so they work with written permissions and a person who approves any step that commits the business. How they differ from a chatbot →
There's no price list, and we're not being cagey. The price depends on how large and customised the system is, and how long it takes us to design, test and set it up with your data. All of that depends on your volumes. Quoting a figure now would mean making it up.
Thirty days at most for the first piece, and the baseline is taken on day one. At the end of the thirty days there's no automatic renewal and no penalty: the system stays yours, credentials included.
It stays yours. Which tools handle what, where the data ends up and how far each supplier's access goes is all written down, and can be changed. The full page →
No. We build around what you already use: the system reads and writes where you work today. Changing business software is a project in its own right, and it doesn't fit into thirty days.
The system works on its own and delivers the result where you already look: email, your phone, the spreadsheet you open every morning. If you have to learn something to use it, it's been built wrong.
That's the norm, not the exception: it's the gap between the 81% who use it and the 25% who have built it into their work. A tool in one person's hands helps with that half hour; it doesn't touch the step the business repeats eighty times a month. How to close that gap →
On a call, by phone, on WhatsApp or by email, you speak to the same person who then builds the system and looks after it afterwards.
We agree on the number to watch before we start, and I show it to you again after thirty days.
Where we started: food and agricultural exporters, hospitality, restaurants. The method doesn't change with the sector: only the starting point does. · Where I come from →
The steps where you're losing out, listed. A figure, and the place to start.
No quote, no contract, no one chasing you in the days after.